first one in my new series 4 seasons.."winter"

this one is called quite simply "winter",she belongs to the 4 seasons series,she is the first one i created in this series,my daughter in law Sarah suggested i turn her into christmas cards...so i did...picture to follow...i am especially proud of this lovely winter goddess as she is the spirit who stirred up the sleeping poetic creativity in my husband,he wrote the verse for this christmas card.....you can view this beautiful poem and many more  at... www.thebardofbryn.blogspot.co.uk

MY SPIRIT OF NATURE SERIES,FROM MY FANTASY JOURNAL

these are from my fantasy journal I didnt plan them ,they just kinda came out of my brush,naturally and organically,I named the series quite aptly the "spirit of nature"  .....



8/29

 this one is watercolour,with no pre drawing,done for the 29 faces challenge,i quite like this one.....

Cyanide? Are Apple Seeds Poisonous or Good For You?

hello there again its me here,helping keep you informed and healthy.......................................
The first and foremost thing we all need to realise is that the medical proffesion DOES NOT CARE  about you..here I am talking higher levels of medics..government rep for health ,drug cartells,etc.in other words the ones who decide what treatments,drugs type of care etc.we are allowed to recieve.........our own gps probably do care but are mainly trained "to put a plaster "on our illnesses,that is cover up the symptom,not cut out the boil,ie get to the root of why we are ill....read the following piece if you will ...it outlines the fact that gps know little or nothing about human nutrition The  human body is a miraculous machine,designed to heal and repair its self,given the correct fuel...after all what would happen if we put petrol in a diesel car? would it run well?
the exact same thing applies to our bodies...
Immagine if you will ....a mechanic only trained to repair vehicles ,having little or no knowledge in the correct type of fuel in which the car needs to function .............a good scenario for our friend the mechanic he would be  a millionare doing repairs almost 24/7 it would be much more beneficial for the vehicle owner if he were to inform him which fuel his car needs.....lets think about that one for a moment. in the context of the human being......empty hospitals...empty  doctors surgerys  and what about those drug giants?.......this is not what they want...it pays for us to be sick.......keep tuned in ...and i WILL show you how to be healthy and WELL.....and trust me "THEY"will not make it easy....but it can be done if you really want to "BEAT THE SYSTEM"

As more and more studies confirm the importance of healthy food choices in preventing and treating disease, nutrition has become an important part of what constitutes good medical care. Unfortunately, the curriculum taught at most medical schools only superficially touches upon this fundamentally important topic. This means that doctors are taking on the role of health care providers without a firm grasp of the role nutrition plays in causing, preventing, and treating diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. When it comes to healing and nutrition, why is there such a gap in knowledge among practicing medical doctors? Can you trust what your own doctor tells you about nutrition?
One of the reasons for a lack of focus on nutrition in the training of doctors is that physicians are primarily trained to treat disease using conventional methods which generally involves the use of antibiotics and drugs. Drugs and antibiotics are a "quick fix" that gives both the patient and doctor the immediate gratification they’re looking for, although in some cases these medications can do significant harm in the process. Doctors feel most comfortable when they can see immediate improvement in a patient's condition and may feel inadequate when they can't achieve a fast cure. Plus, the lack of in-depth knowledge and training in the principles of nutrition are a limiting factor for some doctors.

 

Sugar 'is toxic and must be regulated just like cigarettes', claim scientists

'A little is not a problem but a lot kills - slowly' Sugar 'contributes to 35m deaths a year' worldwide Sugar is a poison and its sale should be as tightly regulated as cigarettes and alcohol, scientists say. They warn that sugary foods and drinks are responsible for illnesses including obesity, heart disease, cancer and liver problems. And they claim it contributes to 35million deaths a year worldwide and is so dangerous it should be...

Source: RiseEarth

Dawn Myler shared a link.

Poisonous hip implants 'putting thousands of British patients at risk' as medical watchdog launches.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

Medical regulators are considering new evidence about ‘metal on metal’ implants disintegrating, destroying muscle tissue and leaking metal into the bloodstream

Dawn Myler shared Gina VFB's photo.

Wall Photos

He does not want to be ground up alive, just because he was born male :*(
http:/.../www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ--faib7to

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150165238556756.339410.542371755&type=3See more

RiseEarth: Proof that the cancer industry doesn't want a cure - even if it's a pharmaceutical

RiseEarth: Proof that the cancer industry doesn't want a cure - even if it's a pharmaceutical

Gut Sense: Restoring Intestinal Flora

Gut Sense: Restoring Intestinal Flora

hi again, on this fine january morning,here again helping to keep you healthy and informed,please read the following post if you dont read anything else today...but sorry i posted 2 by mistake......namaste....and happy days to all...

Your good health translates into zero profit for the pharmaceutical industry. General well-being of the public and cures for disease would mean the collapse of the pharmaceutical industry since they must have illness to have demand for their drugs, in order to exist. This is the truth that drives political corruption, mandating of vaccines, control over the healthcare industry, and efforts to destroy natural health companies and practititioners. 

But to accomplish and sustain your ill health, the pharmaceutical industry must confuse people about the source of good health, make sure there is no access to what people actually need to be well (including information), and keep the public perpetually frightened of diseases and their risk of dying.

The pharmaceutical industry works especially hard to keep the public from knowing two things, a central one about people’s biology, and a central one about their drugs:

1. People are blessed with an immune system which does a phenomenal job day in and day out in protecting them, and in helping them get well if they become ill. Their being well does not depend on luck. People get cancer, for instance, many times over their lifetime but naturally shrug it off because their immune system is designed to do just that.

2. Most drugs do not “cure” disease or support the functioning of the body (insulin is an exception) but only mask symptoms. Antibiotics kill pathogens but they simultaneously wipe out people’s immune system. Both things concern the immune system and are in serious conflict: people’s immune system is what keeps them healthy and most of what the pharmaceutical industry has to offer messes it up. Those two facts are not selling points for the industry.

So, the less the public knows about how their body works, the less they trust their own bodies, the less they are able to support it in functioning optimally, the better for the pharmaceutical industry. That is, the more afraid and helpless people feel, the better . So, the industry works to create myths that keep the public anxious.

You are just lucky to be healthy (so far);
You have only avoided disease “somehow”;
You are vulnerable at every moment;
You are harboring disease you just don’t know about yet;
Your genetics have condemned you to whatever you may “get”;
Infectious diseases are terrifying and deadly, can crop up at any time, and are getting worse by the year;
Natural food supplements are not only worthless but dangerous;
Staying or getting well is terribly complex, dependent on extensive testing and medical expertise; and
You can’t live without industry’s expensive drugs and vaccines.

Rubbish. Nonsense. Hogwash. Fiddle-faddle.

When it comes to chronic or infectious diseases, what the industry doesn’t want people to realize is that they come naturally equipped with an ideal means of staying well – an immune system that runs on automatic pilot – and that they can stay well or get well, simply and cheaply on its own.

So, how does this miraculous immune system work? What does it consist of?

Bacteria. Lowly bacteria!

Seventy to eighty percent of the immune system is in the gut and it consists of friendly bacteria. People are dependent on those friendly bugs and stay well primarily thanks to them and the work they do for free. A Yale study lionizes those very bacteria for helping prevent type 1 diabetes and questions whether people haven’t overdone hygiene since the body needs to be challenged to be strong.

For most people, thinking of bacteria as positive constitutes a major paradigm shift. Everyone has been endlessly schooled in the dangers of bacteria and along with that accepted their own vulnerability, their dependence on pharmaceuticals to protect themselves, and a randomness about getting sick (one can lose this bacteria battle at any moment and for no reason). To take in the opposite, that people are not only helped by little bugs but are accompanied by them as they busily protect their host, is quite an overturning of thinking. But it is the shift that allows people to see that they don’t need to be afraid and that chronic and infectious diseases are not some random attack from outside but are related to a weakening of the immune system (or a threat to the good little bugs inside).

To bury the fact that lowly bacteria is everyone’s friendly and potent protector, the pharmaceutical industry continues to do all it can to teach people to fear bacteria, to even be terrified of it, and to encourages people to do everything in their power to avoid or get rid bacteria through intense, even sterilizing, hygiene. Thus the growth in sales of antibacterial soap and hand sanitizers and all the ads for kitchen and bathroom cleaners showing bacteria being wiped out. There is even an ad of a child reaching to touch his sibling in the back seat of a car, with creepy green “germs” growing on his hands. What great fear. Sterilize the kid.

“But what about pasteurization?” you ask. “Didn’t that protect people by killing bugs?”

Yes, but then again, no. Yes, it protected people from abnormal bugs that resulted from the abuses of industry in producing milk. Milk was first pasteurized in order to deal with contamination of milk from dairy cows brought into large cities by industry, fed brewery waste and forced to live under filthy, unnatural conditions. That is, pasteurization was used for milk coming from cows forced into the first CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations). Pasteurization was an industrial process used to kill off dangerous bacteria resulting not from normal milk but from industry’s unclean processes. But no, because at the very same time, unpasteurized milk from normal dairy farms, full of living good bacteria, was so valuable that it was being used by the Mayo Clinic and others to treat diseases. http://bit.ly/6HoC1d

Blurring that distinction in types of bacteria is where industry tricks the public. Normal bacteria is not dangerous but needed.

Natural vs. Chemical

Industrial bacteria from sordid industrial dairy conditions, on the other hand, needed to be gotten rid of through pasteurization because it was dangerous. Industry spun that to their advantage, however, casting pasteurization as a special good – and necessary for all milk – and then worked to change laws across the country to force raw milk dairy farmers whose milk was perfectly safe and still living, to comply. This was not about the safety of the milk but about trapping those dairy farmers into a corporate milk system in which they could no longer sell their living milk directly to customers, but had to sell to middle men who pasteurized the milk until the vital bacteria was dead, and got their assured cut in doing so.

Raw milk dairy farming still exists (the Amish have never stopped producing it) and is making a comeback as more dairy farmers take it up as the only growing segment of the dairy industry, with people buying it for its good taste and health benefits. Industry is now doing all it can to end that completely. Using the false idea that pasteurization is necessary to make all milk safe, they are demanding regulations to enforce pasteurization for raw milk dairy farmers’ milk. This, of course, destroys raw milk, but that’s goal since those farmers offer healthy product (one that greatly supports the immune system) as well as independence for themselves and their customers from corporate control. Both are intolerable to agribusiness and the pharmaceutical industry. http://bit.ly/6Jh15M

Twisting of science – comparing healthy milk to industry’s rotten milk, and natural substances to man-made synthetic ones – is the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA’s means of attacking all natural products. They want to make the little guy who sells natural things that are particularly healthy, go through absurdly inappropriate industrial processes which are only needed to kill off industry-caused pathogens but which kill the value of the natural product. That finishes the little guy and his wonderful product.

Industry also insists that natural supplements can make no claims to health whatever, even if they have studies supporting those claims. Why? Because what other way can they deal with products which actually can make people well, cheaply, and can’t be patented? Cherry growers had a study done that showed cherries are potentially 10 times stronger than aspirin, tylenol and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Now, for the drug companies and FDA that’s not good news, that’s a threat. The only way they could come at that was to keep the producers silent about the value of cherries, which they did, while doing nothing about the thousands of people who die each year from NSAIDS. Natural substances really stick in the craw of the pharmaceutical industry because they are a gift from nature, bypassing corporate control and getting rid of profit-making illness. They are biologic substances tested as safe by human beings for thousands of years – and were the original basis of pharmacology itself. They are so valuable that drug companies, which criticize them at every turn, are meanwhile seeking to patent their (supposedly worthless) properties.

Criminalizing Nature for Chemical Profits: S 510

With a bill in Congress (S 510) meant to wipe out natural supplements, the pharmaceutical industry has been using its influence with media to put out stories against those supplements. The Boston Globe slams a law that distinguishes food supplements from drugs and the AP puts out a series attacking natural health practices. And in the midst of a suspect swine flu which is more and more thought to be bioengineered during Bush’s time in office, the pharmaceutical industry has the FDA warn health stores and websites they may not even have sections labeled “cold” or “flu” or use those words in recommending supplements to people. That is, no one is supposed to know that supplements can help them stay well or get well on their own, or discover how unnecessary vaccines are in the first place if one’s immune system is kept strong, because that would interfere with selling billions in vaccines that many do not want or need.

There are two worlds here. One is natural and provides or supports the good bacteria which is the primary basis of everyone’s immune system (or health). The other is industrial, synthetic, often GMO, and generally (usually greatly) destructive of people’s immune system (and thus, simply put, unhealthy).

People need only understand bacteria keeps them healthy to no longer fall for industry’s “food safety” scares about bacteria because they can see the distinction between good and industrial bacteria and choose food accordingly. Real “food safety” protects good bacteria. It protect farmers who produce products full of good bacteria. It stops industry from inflicting industrial demands and processes – pasteurization, irradiation, antibiotics, etc. – on farmers’s living food products because they contain the good bacteria which make food itself valuable to begin with. Once people recognize they have good bacteria on their side, they will appreciate how it differs from dangerous industrial bacteria from contamination. They will also learn over time that vaccines, drugs, antibiotics, radiation, pasteurization, GMOs, all hurt the little bugs and realize the importance of protecting them.

Drug companies live by the law of industry: profit or perish. The laws they lobby for are worth looking at closely since it suddenly becomes apparent why these corporations cannot ever be on the side of public health. Health is worth literally nothing. Sickness, side effects, and diseases, though, are bonanzas.

Friendly bacteria is the true basis of good health, just as a soil rich in microbes is the true basis of good food. With a strong immune system, people can avoid or recover from chronic and infectious diseases and don’t need to be perpetually afraid. Health is simple – it comes from healthy living food. In knowing this, people are in a good position to stop industry legislation (S 510) that falsely implies all food is dangerous, and that sterilizing living food is “food safety.” We are now in a good position to insist the FDA stop threatening free speech about safe natural supplements, and instead demand that they go after the pharmaceutical industry’s synthetic drugs that routinely kill 100,000 people a year.

Author: Ed Steene

 

Your good health translates into zero profit for the pharmaceutical industry. General well-being of the public and cures for disease would mean the collapse of the pharmaceutical industry since they must have illness to have demand for their drugs, in order to exist. This is the truth that drives political corruption, mandating of vaccines, control over the healthcare industry, and efforts to destroy natural health companies and practititioners. 

But to accomplish and sustain your ill health, the pharmaceutical industry must confuse people about the source of good health, make sure there is no access to what people actually need to be well (including information), and keep the public perpetually frightened of diseases and their risk of dying.

The pharmaceutical industry works especially hard to keep the public from knowing two things, a central one about people’s biology, and a central one about their drugs:

1. People are blessed with an immune system which does a phenomenal job day in and day out in protecting them, and in helping them get well if they become ill. Their being well does not depend on luck. People get cancer, for instance, many times over their lifetime but naturally shrug it off because their immune system is designed to do just that.

2. Most drugs do not “cure” disease or support the functioning of the body (insulin is an exception) but only mask symptoms. Antibiotics kill pathogens but they simultaneously wipe out people’s immune system. Both things concern the immune system and are in serious conflict: people’s immune system is what keeps them healthy and most of what the pharmaceutical industry has to offer messes it up. Those two facts are not selling points for the industry.

So, the less the public knows about how their body works, the less they trust their own bodies, the less they are able to support it in functioning optimally, the better for the pharmaceutical industry. That is, the more afraid and helpless people feel, the better . So, the industry works to create myths that keep the public anxious.

You are just lucky to be healthy (so far);
You have only avoided disease “somehow”;
You are vulnerable at every moment;
You are harboring disease you just don’t know about yet;
Your genetics have condemned you to whatever you may “get”;
Infectious diseases are terrifying and deadly, can crop up at any time, and are getting worse by the year;
Natural food supplements are not only worthless but dangerous;
Staying or getting well is terribly complex, dependent on extensive testing and medical expertise; and
You can’t live without industry’s expensive drugs and vaccines.

Rubbish. Nonsense. Hogwash. Fiddle-faddle.

When it comes to chronic or infectious diseases, what the industry doesn’t want people to realize is that they come naturally equipped with an ideal means of staying well – an immune system that runs on automatic pilot – and that they can stay well or get well, simply and cheaply on its own.

So, how does this miraculous immune system work? What does it consist of?

Bacteria. Lowly bacteria!

Seventy to eighty percent of the immune system is in the gut and it consists of friendly bacteria. People are dependent on those friendly bugs and stay well primarily thanks to them and the work they do for free. A Yale study lionizes those very bacteria for helping prevent type 1 diabetes and questions whether people haven’t overdone hygiene since the body needs to be challenged to be strong.

For most people, thinking of bacteria as positive constitutes a major paradigm shift. Everyone has been endlessly schooled in the dangers of bacteria and along with that accepted their own vulnerability, their dependence on pharmaceuticals to protect themselves, and a randomness about getting sick (one can lose this bacteria battle at any moment and for no reason). To take in the opposite, that people are not only helped by little bugs but are accompanied by them as they busily protect their host, is quite an overturning of thinking. But it is the shift that allows people to see that they don’t need to be afraid and that chronic and infectious diseases are not some random attack from outside but are related to a weakening of the immune system (or a threat to the good little bugs inside).

To bury the fact that lowly bacteria is everyone’s friendly and potent protector, the pharmaceutical industry continues to do all it can to teach people to fear bacteria, to even be terrified of it, and to encourages people to do everything in their power to avoid or get rid bacteria through intense, even sterilizing, hygiene. Thus the growth in sales of antibacterial soap and hand sanitizers and all the ads for kitchen and bathroom cleaners showing bacteria being wiped out. There is even an ad of a child reaching to touch his sibling in the back seat of a car, with creepy green “germs” growing on his hands. What great fear. Sterilize the kid.

“But what about pasteurization?” you ask. “Didn’t that protect people by killing bugs?”

Yes, but then again, no. Yes, it protected people from abnormal bugs that resulted from the abuses of industry in producing milk. Milk was first pasteurized in order to deal with contamination of milk from dairy cows brought into large cities by industry, fed brewery waste and forced to live under filthy, unnatural conditions. That is, pasteurization was used for milk coming from cows forced into the first CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations). Pasteurization was an industrial process used to kill off dangerous bacteria resulting not from normal milk but from industry’s unclean processes. But no, because at the very same time, unpasteurized milk from normal dairy farms, full of living good bacteria, was so valuable that it was being used by the Mayo Clinic and others to treat diseases. http://bit.ly/6HoC1d

Blurring that distinction in types of bacteria is where industry tricks the public. Normal bacteria is not dangerous but needed.

Natural vs. Chemical

Industrial bacteria from sordid industrial dairy conditions, on the other hand, needed to be gotten rid of through pasteurization because it was dangerous. Industry spun that to their advantage, however, casting pasteurization as a special good – and necessary for all milk – and then worked to change laws across the country to force raw milk dairy farmers whose milk was perfectly safe and still living, to comply. This was not about the safety of the milk but about trapping those dairy farmers into a corporate milk system in which they could no longer sell their living milk directly to customers, but had to sell to middle men who pasteurized the milk until the vital bacteria was dead, and got their assured cut in doing so.

Raw milk dairy farming still exists (the Amish have never stopped producing it) and is making a comeback as more dairy farmers take it up as the only growing segment of the dairy industry, with people buying it for its good taste and health benefits. Industry is now doing all it can to end that completely. Using the false idea that pasteurization is necessary to make all milk safe, they are demanding regulations to enforce pasteurization for raw milk dairy farmers’ milk. This, of course, destroys raw milk, but that’s goal since those farmers offer healthy product (one that greatly supports the immune system) as well as independence for themselves and their customers from corporate control. Both are intolerable to agribusiness and the pharmaceutical industry. http://bit.ly/6Jh15M

Twisting of science – comparing healthy milk to industry’s rotten milk, and natural substances to man-made synthetic ones – is the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA’s means of attacking all natural products. They want to make the little guy who sells natural things that are particularly healthy, go through absurdly inappropriate industrial processes which are only needed to kill off industry-caused pathogens but which kill the value of the natural product. That finishes the little guy and his wonderful product.

Industry also insists that natural supplements can make no claims to health whatever, even if they have studies supporting those claims. Why? Because what other way can they deal with products which actually can make people well, cheaply, and can’t be patented? Cherry growers had a study done that showed cherries are potentially 10 times stronger than aspirin, tylenol and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Now, for the drug companies and FDA that’s not good news, that’s a threat. The only way they could come at that was to keep the producers silent about the value of cherries, which they did, while doing nothing about the thousands of people who die each year from NSAIDS. Natural substances really stick in the craw of the pharmaceutical industry because they are a gift from nature, bypassing corporate control and getting rid of profit-making illness. They are biologic substances tested as safe by human beings for thousands of years – and were the original basis of pharmacology itself. They are so valuable that drug companies, which criticize them at every turn, are meanwhile seeking to patent their (supposedly worthless) properties.

Criminalizing Nature for Chemical Profits: S 510

With a bill in Congress (S 510) meant to wipe out natural supplements, the pharmaceutical industry has been using its influence with media to put out stories against those supplements. The Boston Globe slams a law that distinguishes food supplements from drugs and the AP puts out a series attacking natural health practices. And in the midst of a suspect swine flu which is more and more thought to be bioengineered during Bush’s time in office, the pharmaceutical industry has the FDA warn health stores and websites they may not even have sections labeled “cold” or “flu” or use those words in recommending supplements to people. That is, no one is supposed to know that supplements can help them stay well or get well on their own, or discover how unnecessary vaccines are in the first place if one’s immune system is kept strong, because that would interfere with selling billions in vaccines that many do not want or need.

There are two worlds here. One is natural and provides or supports the good bacteria which is the primary basis of everyone’s immune system (or health). The other is industrial, synthetic, often GMO, and generally (usually greatly) destructive of people’s immune system (and thus, simply put, unhealthy).

People need only understand bacteria keeps them healthy to no longer fall for industry’s “food safety” scares about bacteria because they can see the distinction between good and industrial bacteria and choose food accordingly. Real “food safety” protects good bacteria. It protect farmers who produce products full of good bacteria. It stops industry from inflicting industrial demands and processes – pasteurization, irradiation, antibiotics, etc. – on farmers’s living food products because they contain the good bacteria which make food itself valuable to begin with. Once people recognize they have good bacteria on their side, they will appreciate how it differs from dangerous industrial bacteria from contamination. They will also learn over time that vaccines, drugs, antibiotics, radiation, pasteurization, GMOs, all hurt the little bugs and realize the importance of protecting them.

Drug companies live by the law of industry: profit or perish. The laws they lobby for are worth looking at closely since it suddenly becomes apparent why these corporations cannot ever be on the side of public health. Health is worth literally nothing. Sickness, side effects, and diseases, though, are bonanzas.

Friendly bacteria is the true basis of good health, just as a soil rich in microbes is the true basis of good food. With a strong immune system, people can avoid or recover from chronic and infectious diseases and don’t need to be perpetually afraid. Health is simple – it comes from healthy living food. In knowing this, people are in a good position to stop industry legislation (S 510) that falsely implies all food is dangerous, and that sterilizing living food is “food safety.” We are now in a good position to insist the FDA stop threatening free speech about safe natural supplements, and instead demand that they go after the pharmaceutical industry’s synthetic drugs that routinely kill 100,000 people a year.

Author: Ed Steene

 

hi here i go again ,helping you  keep healthy and informed.....also introducing some new and alternative ideas for health and welbeing.......
crystal therapy has always worked for me and my family being a clean alternative to convential medicine ...most stones can be purchased cheaply from ebay......check out the link below.....any comments welcome....namaste

Crystals and Gemstones and their Metaphysical Healing Properties. Philip Chave: Spiritual Healer, Distant Healer.

Crystals and Gemstones and their Metaphysical Healing Properties. Philip Chave: Spiritual Healer, Distant Healer.

David Icke Speaking For Two Hours On Mainstream Croatian Television - David Icke Website

David Icke Speaking For Two Hours On Mainstream Croatian Television - David Icke Website

David Icke Speaking For Two Hours On Mainstream Croatian Television - David Icke Website

David Icke Speaking For Two Hours On Mainstream Croatian Television - David Icke Website

Dawn of a new era:

Dawn of a new era:

Hormonal Milk and Meat: A Dangerous Public Health Risk | Healthy Child Healthy World

Hormonal Milk and Meat: A Dangerous Public Health Risk Healthy Child Healthy World

Dawn Myler

something to consider....Imagine, sang John Lennon, a world with no religion. Imagine no suicide bombers, no 9/11, no 7/7, no Crusades, no witch-hunts, no Gunpowder Plot, no Kashmir dispute, no Indo/Pakistan partition, no Israel/Palestine wars, no Serb/Croat/Muslim massacres, no Northern Ireland 'troubles'. Imagine no Taliban blowing up ancient statues, lashing women for showing an inch of skin, or publicly beheading blasphemers and apostates. Imagine no persecutions of the Jews - no Jews to persecute indeed, for without religion none of these atrocities would have happened

BURTS BEES DO A TALC FREE POWDWR WITH NATURAL CORNSTARCH  FOR AROUND £7.00,ALSO FEMFRESH DO A TALC FREE POWDER FOR ABOUT £3.00.......

HI THERE HERE I GO AGAIN ,KEEPING YOU INFORMED AND HEALTHY....MORE INFO ON SAFER ALTERNATIVES TO TRADITIONAL TALC
.....Talc comes to mind when we think about body powder or baby powder. Although inexpensive, concerns have been raised about the long-term safety of using talcum powder.

Talcum powder consists of zinc stearate and a variety of silicates, all of which are finely ground. These small particles are easily carried in the air, and quickly inhaled. Inhalation of talcum powder can be life-threatening, especially for babies. It can lead to illnesses such as pneumonia and inflammation of the airways. It has also been suggested that talc may cause lung, skin and ovarian cancers.

Thankfully, there are safe alternatives to using talcum powder. I've compiled a list of my favorite base powder choices, and all are excellent substitute for talc as dusting powder – light, soft and absorbent. Your skin will feel delightfully smooth and silky all day, with a lovely floral fragrance.
 California Baby’s Calming Non-Talc Powder, and avoid perfumed genital sprays.
see this link....http://www.epinions.com/review/Pwd_Non_Talc_2_5oz/content_418240958084,this can be purchased on ebay,,,but i must warn you it is quite expensive,but what price do you put on you and your familys health.....see ebay link.......
http://www.epinions.com/review/Pwd_Non_Talc_2_5oz/content_418240958084........
Safe Natural Non-Toxic Talc Substitutes

hi there,its me here again,helping to keep you all informed  and healthy......
you may be interested to read my latest post.....

Q. What is talc?

A. Talc is a mineral, produced by the mining of talc rocks and then processed by crushing, drying and milling. Processing eliminates a number of trace minerals from the talc, but does not separate minute fibers which are very similar to asbestos.

Q. What kinds of consumer products contain talc?

A. Talc is found in a wide variety of consumer products ranging from home and garden pesticides to antacids. However, the products most widely used and that pose the most serious health risks are body powders Talc is the main ingredient in baby powder, medicated powders, perfumed powders and designer perfumed body powders. Because talc is resistant to moisture, it is also used by the pharmaceutical industry to manufacture medications and is a listed ingredient of some antacids. Talc is the principal ingredient home and garden pesticides and flea and tick powders. Talc is used in smaller quantities in deodorants, chalk, crayons, textiles, soap, insulating materials, paints, asphalt filler, paper, and in food processing.

Q. Why is talc harmful?

A. Talc is closely related to the potent carcinogen asbestos. Talc particles have been shown to cause tumors in the ovaries and lungs of cancer victims. For the last 30 years, scientists have closely scrutinized talc particles and found dangerous similarities to asbestos. Responding to this evidence in 1973, the FDA drafted a resolution that would limit the amount of asbestos-like fibers in cosmetic grade talc. However, no ruling has ever been made and today, cosmetic grade talc remains non-regulated by the federal government. This inaction ignores a 1993 National Toxicology Program report which found that cosmetic grade talc, without any asbestos-like fibers, caused tumors in animal subjects.1 Clearly with or without asbestos-like fibers, cosmetic grade talcum powder is a carcinogen.

Q. What kind of exposure is dangerous?

A. Talc is toxic. Talc particles cause tumors in human ovaries and lungs. Numerous studies have shown a strong link between frequent use of talc in the female genital area and ovarian cancer. Talc particles are able to move through the reproductive system and become imbedded in the lining of the ovary. Researchers have found talc particles in ovarian tumors and have found that women with ovarian cancer have used talcum powder in their genital area more frequently than healthy women.2

Talc poses a health risk when exposed to the lungs. Talc miners have shown higher rates of lung cancer and other respiratory illnesses from exposure to industrial grade talc, which contains dangerous silica and asbestos. The common household hazard posed by talc is inhalation of baby powder by infants. Since the early 1980s, records show that several thousand infants each year have died or become seriously ill following accidental inhalation of baby powder.3

Q. What about infants?

A. Talc is used on babies because it absorbs unpleasant moisture. Clearly, dusting with talcum powder endangers an infant's lungs at the prospect of inhalation. Exposing children to this carcinogen is unnecessary and dangerous.

ACTIONS YOU CAN TAKE:

1. Do not buy or use products containing talc. It is especially important that women not apply talc to underwear or sanitary pads.

2. Contact your pediatrician and/or local hospital and find out if they have a policy regarding talc use and infants.

3. Write to the FDA and express your concern that a proven carcinogen has remained unregulated while millions of people are unknowingly exposed.

References:

1.National Toxicology Program. "Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of talc (GAS No 14807-96-6) in F344/N rats and B6C3F, mice (Inhalation studies)." Technical Report Series No. 421. September 1993.

2. Harlow BL, Cramer DW, Bell DA, Welch WR. "Perineal exposure to talc and ovarian cancer risk." Obstetrics & Gynecology, 80: 19-26, 1992.

3. Hollinger MA. "Pulmonary toxicity of inhaled and intravenous talc." Toxicology Letters, 52:121-127, 1990.

More…

Press Conference on Talc

Petition to Ban Talc

CONTACT:

Cancer Prevention Coalition
c/o University of Illinois at Chicago

School of Public Health, M/C 922
2121 West Taylor Street
Chicago, IL 60612
Tel: (312) 996-2297
E-mail: epstein@uic.edu

 

Year in review: 37 communities vote to end artificial water fluoridation in 2011

TOXIC TAP WATER IS ONE OF MY GREATEST PASSIONS,NOT ONLY ARE CERTAIN AREAS DRINKING FLUORIDATED WATER....BUT WATER THAT IS FROM SCOURCES YOU WOULD NOT ALLOW YOUR PET TO DRINK.....RECYCLED SEWERAGE....WIGAN IS ONE OF THESE AREAS....PLEASE READ THE INFO BELOW,LUCKILY WE IN WIGAN ARE NOT ,FLUORIDATED,BUT WE ARE ONLY TOO EAGER TO USE IT IN TOOTHPASTE....PERSONALLY I WOULD RATHER JUST ELIMINATE THE CAUSE OF TOOTH DECAY,RATHER THAN USE A FLUORIDE TOOTHPASTE
..............................................

Custom Search

Web

Monday, January 9, 2012

Year in review: 37 communities vote to end artificial water fluoridation in 2011

8:00 PM RiseEarth No comments

 0 0StumbleUpon0Reddit0ShareThisNew

How many will follow in 2012?

A total of 37 communities vote to end artificial water fluoridation in 2011. Is your community on that list? With all the toxins in today’s drinking water it should be. 

The year 2011 just might go down in history as the year that initiated the end of artificial water fluoridation. Nearly three million people living in 37 different North America communities will no longer be forcibly medicated with synthetic fluoride chemicals via their public water supplies, thanks to a groundswell of dedicated citizens and city council members that fought popular myths about fluoride with scientific truth — and won!

According to data compiled by the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), a group devoted to exposing the truth about the toxicity and dangers of fluoride chemicals, 37 cities and communities across the US and Canada officially ended their water fluoridation programs in 2011. From small towns like Tellico, Tenn., which has just 900 residents, to large cities like Calgary, Alberta, with over 1.3 million residents, the truth about fluoride is spreading like wildfire.

For far too long, water utilities mostly in the United States and in some parts of Canada have been adding toxic fluoride chemicals to drinking water supplies because they were told that doing so would help prevent tooth decay. It never really mattered to most of them that no scientific studies had ever proven that ingesting fluoride chemicals is safe, or that it helped improve oral health.

In fact, most of these utilities probably just went along with what they were told, and popular consensus seemed to agree at the time that lacing tap water with an unregulated drug, which just so happens to be a toxic waste byproduct of the aluminum and phosphate mining industries, was a good idea.

But a lot more information about fluoride has surfaced in recent years that contradicts what people believed about it 50 years ago. And with so many modern illnesses and deficiencies that are now attributed to fluoride exposure, removing the chemical from water supplies is a no-brainer for many who recognize that mass medication with an unapproved drug is not the answer to the world’s dental problems.

Witnessing these many victories against fluoride throughout the past year has been inspiring. But what is even better is the prospect that twice as many, or even three times as many — or more — could follow suit in 2012! The ball is rolling to end the pseudoscientific practice of water fluoridation, and the number of communities that still fluoridate their water supplies are falling. Will your community be next?

HI THERE,HERE IS A LINK I FOUND VERY INTERESTING ,I THOUGHT SOME OF YOU MAY BE INTERESTED,I WAS.......
http://www.riseearth.com/2012/01/2012-year-of-consciousness.html.......I THINK IN THIS WORLD OF DOG EAT DOG ,AND THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF ..I..,AND NOT ..WE..THIS CERTAINLY ,IN MY OPINION IS THE WAY TO GO......

Castlerig stone circle,a truly beautiful and mystical place,nestled in the lake districts awesome rolling hills and mountains.........
If you can see the area where the flowers are..this is said to be where ritual sacrifice was practiced,human,animal who knows ?
It is a place highly charged with mysterious atmosphere,you can see the hills in the background....but turn 360 degrees and its as if the monolith is inside a huge crater.......an ideal landing place for visitors from another world......perhaps its these very beings the circle was created for ,to venerate,maybe even pray for their return,who knows............................
Its definately worth a  visit

HELLO AGAIN,   ITS THAT TIME OF YEAR ,WE ARE ALL STUFFED TO THE HILT WITH XMAS GOODIES,AND IF YOU ARE LIKE ME ..SUFFERING FROM CHOCOLATE OVERLOAD.....

IF YOU ARE FEELING THE NEED TO RID YOURSELF OF ALL THOSE NASTY TOXINS WE SO EAGERLY CHOMPED AND GUZZLED OUR WAY THROUGH DURING THE FESTIVE SEASON,LOOK NO FURTHER.....

DETOX TIME....ME THINKS.....

1.DRINK PLENTY WATER,ITS A GREAT WAY TO FLUSH NASTIES OUT
2.HOT WATER WITH FRESH LEMON JUICE AS OFTEN AS POSS....HELPS TO KICK START YOUR SLUGGISH LIVER INTO ACTION..
3.ADD FREH FRUIT TO YOUR DAILY EATING PLAN..
4.ALSO FRESH VEG(PREFERABLY ORGANIC....WE SHALL TALK MORE ABOUT THIS ANOTHER DAY)
5.TRY TO WALK .A BIT MORE,IT WILL HELP TO SPEED UP THE METABOLISM

AND THERE WE GO STEP ONE TO A NEW YOU...GIVE IT A GO !!!!!

HERE IS ANOTHER USEFUL AND INFORMATIVE LINK
http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/emf-dangers.aspx

• AT THE MOMENT MY PASSION IS TO MAKE PEOPLE COMPREHEND HOW VERY DANGEROUS SOLAR PANELS REALLY ARE....

  .HOW VERY STRANGE... THE GOVERNMENT HAVE INSTIGATED AN INITIATIVE TO INSTALL SOLAR PANELS INTO  THE MAJORITY OF COUNCIL HOMES FOR...WAIT FOR IT  FREE....THIS MADE ME THINK....THE GOVERNMENT ARE ALWAYS SAYING HOW TIGHT MONEY IS , AND MAKING MASSIVE  CUT BACKS ,AND YET THEY CAN PAY FOR THESE...FOR US THE  THE ..COMMON PEOPLE ....

  AFTER HOURS OF RESEARCH...I REALISE..NO....THE ONLY REASON IS THAT THEY THEY ARE CREAMING OFF THE ELECTRICITY FOR THEMSELVES  GIVING EACH HOUSEHOLD A MEAGRE 100 POUNDS A YEAR SAVING 

  AND GREEN...I FEAR NOT.....THEY CANNOT BE DISPOSED OF IN A SAFE AND GREEN WAY AT THE END OF THEIR LIFE EXPECTANCY

  AND TO ADD ANOTHER INSULT TO INJURY IF THEY COMBUST WHICH INCIDENTALLY THEY CAN...THE FIRE BRIGADE WILL NOT TACKLE IT BECAUSE YOUR ROOF IS LIVE WITH FREE ELECTRICITY !

  AND FINALLY ...I ASK WOULD YOU LIVE UNDER AN ELECTRICITY PYLON ?...ANY SANE HUMAN BEING KNOWS HOW DANGEROUS THEY ARE AND THE HEALTH RISKS INVOLVED IN RESIDING IN THE CLOSE VICINITY OF THEM.....REPORTED LEUKAEMIA CLUSTERS....,

  SEE THE LINK BELOW AND PLEASE COME BACK AGAIN FOR MORE INFO...

  
  

  Solar cells/panels are DC - which is the natural form of EMFs - not AC, which is the artificial and therefore potentially dangerous form of EMFs.
  
  Our 60-cycle AC power grid is a 6th harmonic of the 10-Hertz/cycle brain wave and by its constant oscillation from positive to negative sets up a harmful standing wave in the body's EM system. This creates vibration at the cellular level and results in ...the distortion or destruction of protein and other receptors in the cell. The vibration can cause them to break - like repeatedly bending a coat hanger - or become distorted so proteins and other vital molecules can no longer bind to the cells as needed.
  
  The vibration is also the main suspected cause of cancer. Witness the cancer pockets near high-voltage power lines and the fact that cancer is now considered a "normal" childhood disease.
  
  Go to www.the-phoenix-project.org for more information (site still under construction) or Google "cymatics" or "resonance" or "chladni plate" or "entrainment". You'll start to get the idea.